Show simple item record

contributor authorChing-Jung Ting
contributor authorPaul Schonfeld
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:09:55Z
date available2017-05-08T21:09:55Z
date copyrightJanuary 1996
date issued1996
identifier other%28asce%290733-950x%281996%29122%3A1%2816%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/41122
description abstractThis paper presents several heuristic methods for sequencing tows through waterway locks, including locks with two dissimilar chambers. Two algorithms are proposed for obtaining good initial solutions. Of these, the shortest processing time first (SPF) algorithm gives priority to tows with lower processing time per barge, while maximum saving (SAVE) favors tows with the highest relative advantage at particular chambers. The resulting improvements in delays and capacity are evaluated by comparing these algorithms with a first come first served (FCFS) operation. Delay savings of up to 75.85% with SAVE and up to 79.73% with SPF are projected at congested locks. A pairwise exchange algorithm is used to improve the initial solutions obtained with SPF and SAVE. The improved methods, SPF with exchange (SPFX) and SAVE with exchange (SAVEX), further reduce the average barge delay. While SPFX does not improve much on SPF, SAVEX reduces average barge delay by up to 26.5% compared to SAVE. Among all these methods, SPFX yields the smallest barge delay (up to 79.8% less than FCFS). The delay savings can be even greater when upstream and downstream flows are unequal.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleEffects of Tow Sequencing on Capacity and Delay at a Waterway Lock
typeJournal Paper
journal volume122
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(1996)122:1(16)
treeJournal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering:;1996:;Volume ( 122 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record