Show simple item record

contributor authorT. M. Baranowski
contributor authorE. J. LeBoeuf
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:08:22Z
date available2017-05-08T21:08:22Z
date copyrightJuly 2008
date issued2008
identifier other%28asce%290733-9496%282008%29134%3A4%28386%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/40169
description abstractFollowing the identification of a contaminant in a water distribution network, a variety of response actions must be examined in order to implement the most beneficial consequence management strategy. Optimization techniques can be employed to determine the cost/benefit of reducing impacts to the network from contamination by isolating and/or flushing the system. In this current effort, we employ a genetic algorithm to minimize contaminant concentrations in a network while minimizing the cost of demand alteration. Application of this technique to two relatively simple networks demonstrates the usefulness of this optimization method as a consequence management strategy to reduce contaminant concentration. For the EPANET Example 1 network, the optimal response solution included closure of two pipes and alteration of the demand at one node, reducing the total network concentration by 95%, with a 73% increase in total network demand. For the Anytown network, the optimal response solution included altering the demand at four nodes, which resulted in a 12% increase in total network demand, while closing four pipes reduced the total network concentration by 54%.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleConsequence Management Utilizing Optimization
typeJournal Paper
journal volume134
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2008)134:4(386)
treeJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2008:;Volume ( 134 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record