Show simple item record

contributor authorDaniel P. Ames
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:08:07Z
date available2017-05-08T21:08:07Z
date copyrightMay 2006
date issued2006
identifier other%28asce%290733-9496%282006%29132%3A3%28204%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/40007
description abstract7Q10 streamflow estimates used to support modeling and data analysis under the Clean Water Act national pollution discharge elimination system and total maximum daily load programs can have direct environmental and economic impacts. Thus it is important that 7Q10 streamflow always be reported together with confidence limits indicating the reliability of the estimate. In practice this is rarely done. This technical note presents a bootstrap approach for computing 7Q10 confidence limits from data and compares it to an empirical method. A case study using randomly selected subsets of data from five rivers in Idaho is used to evaluate the two methods. While both methods exhibit the expected increase in confidence interval as fewer years of data used, the bootstrap approach generally results in wider confidence intervals than does the empirical method. The opposite appears to be true in cases where fewer than
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleEstimating 7Q10 Confidence Limits from Data: A Bootstrap Approach
typeJournal Paper
journal volume132
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2006)132:3(204)
treeJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2006:;Volume ( 132 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record