Show simple item record

contributor authorDavid H. Axworthy
contributor authorBryan W. Karney
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:07:14Z
date available2017-05-08T21:07:14Z
date copyrightMay 1996
date issued1996
identifier other%28asce%290733-9496%281996%29122%3A3%28218%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/39422
description abstractUnder most circumstances, dispersive processes can be neglected in water distribution systems due to high velocities and low dispersion coefficients that ensure that advective transport dominates constituent spreading. However, during periods of low flow, dispersive effects may become important if the velocities are significantly decreased (e.g., during the night). Thus, the question that arises during a 24-h simulation is whether dispersive processes may dominate the transport of chlorine in a water distribution system. Given that advective transport models (e.g., EPANET, PICCOLO, NET, and DWQM) cannot account for dispersive transport, it is likely that these models would underpredict the required concentration of chlorine at locations behind the advective front and overpredict the required concentration at locations in advance of the advective front. Therefore, when is a purely advective transport model an appropriate solution for contaminant transport in a water distribution system? Two constraining equations are presented to aid the user in assessing the applicability of an advective transport model.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleModeling Low Velocity/High Dispersion Flow in Water Distribution Systems
typeJournal Paper
journal volume122
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1996)122:3(218)
treeJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;1996:;Volume ( 122 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record