Show simple item record

contributor authorNeil S. Grigg
contributor authorEvan C. Vlachos
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:06:57Z
date available2017-05-08T21:06:57Z
date copyrightSeptember 1993
date issued1993
identifier other%28asce%290733-9496%281993%29119%3A5%28531%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/39228
description abstractManaging drought during the 1980s taught that it is essential to define the roles of local, state, and federal governments. Roles are still being worked out, especially in the cross‐cutting areas of planning and coordination. Local government, on the firing line, faces questions about levels of risk and drought response plans. State government has five roles: planning, coordination, data and technical assistance, emergency aid, and regulatory actions (mainly restricting water use). The federal government has roles in operation of federal reservoirs, in coordination, and in data management. Gaining appreciation for the complexity of drought and for the need for coordinated action requires further improvement. The solution to drought problems in better water resources management through a continuing process, not a prescription to be abandoned when a drought is over. The nation is still looking for the correct allocation of roles in this process. Lessons learned from recent droughts can improve the process.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleDrought and Water‐Supply Management: Roles and Responsibilities
typeJournal Paper
journal volume119
journal issue5
journal titleJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1993)119:5(531)
treeJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;1993:;Volume ( 119 ):;issue: 005
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record