Show simple item record

contributor authorDavid J. Plazak
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:06:14Z
date available2017-05-08T21:06:14Z
date copyrightMarch 1986
date issued1986
identifier other%28asce%290733-9496%281986%29112%3A2%28265%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/38779
description abstractThis paper provides a brief description of the most common method of calculating urban flood damages‐prevented benefits and critically appraises the data, assumptions, and techniques that may lead to erroneous estimates of benefits. Several issues were identified that, to the writer's knowledge, are not typically addressed in studies: (1) Bias resulting from inaccurate estimates of structure elevations; (2) failure to consider that unemployed labor may be used to repair flood damages; (3) failure to consider replacement of existing structures; and (4) underestimation of willingness to pay for repairs. With a better understanding of the weaknesses of current techniques, future research and data gathering can be directed to yield the greatest increase in overall accuracy.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleFlood Control Benefits Revisited
typeJournal Paper
journal volume112
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1986)112:2(265)
treeJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;1986:;Volume ( 112 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record