Show simple item record

contributor authorJohn W. Horner
contributor authorJohn R. Stone
contributor authorLeta F. Huntsinger
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:05:53Z
date available2017-05-08T21:05:53Z
date copyrightDecember 2008
date issued2008
identifier other%28asce%290733-9488%282008%29134%3A4%28149%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/38580
description abstractSmall and medium sized towns often lack resources for the data collection required by many transportation planning methods. In many cases, though, data from a regional or national source may be transferred to the small town or used in the form of national averages. We focus on the case of towns on the fringe of large metropolitan areas and compare various data reuse techniques. We defined a quantitative categorization method that indicates for a given town if local data transfer or national data transfer is preferable. The analysis is based on two surveys of North Carolina metropolitan areas and their surroundings (Charlotte and Raleigh-Durham) representing 5,000 households in 90 municipalities ranging in size from a few hundred population to half a million. Our results show that planners working in FRINGE towns can defensibly use the NCHRP 365 trip rates dictated by the nearby urban center, or existing trip rates derived from surveys of the urban center itself.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleData Reuse Methods for Transportation Planning in Small- and Medium-Sized Towns
typeJournal Paper
journal volume134
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Urban Planning and Development
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2008)134:4(149)
treeJournal of Urban Planning and Development:;2008:;Volume ( 134 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record