Show simple item record

contributor authorDeborah A. Lange
contributor authorSue McNeil
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:05:45Z
date available2017-05-08T21:05:45Z
date copyrightJune 2004
date issued2004
identifier other%28asce%290733-9488%282004%29130%3A2%28109%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/38445
description abstractBrownfield development can be a “win-win” situation for the majority of the stakeholders that have an interest in the near- and long-term use of a currently unrealized asset. Further, brownfield development is a complex and time-consuming problem, only part of which is related to environmental concerns. Whereas there seems to be a flurry of brownfield development, both nationally and internationally, tools are lacking that can help to support complex decision making and ultimately expedite site remediation and development. In this research, we have collected data from 75 brownfields in the United States, analyzed the data to be able to distinguish “successful” from “not-so-successful” sites, and developed a logit model that may be used to estimate the probability of development outcomes. Much of the brownfield literature focuses on anecdote and qualitative descriptions of experiences. Therefore this research, which is based on empirical analyses, contributes to the literature by proposing a predictive model that may support rational decision making. Additionally, this research provides recommendations for application and improvement of the model.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleBrownfield Development: Tools for Stewardship
typeJournal Paper
journal volume130
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Urban Planning and Development
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2004)130:2(109)
treeJournal of Urban Planning and Development:;2004:;Volume ( 130 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record