Show simple item record

contributor authorNeil S. Grigg
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:05:33Z
date available2017-05-08T21:05:33Z
date copyrightJune 1997
date issued1997
identifier other%28asce%290733-9488%281997%29123%3A2%2823%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/38338
description abstractSystems techniques offer civil engineers new tools for the analysis and synthesis of systemic issues, and they could be used more effectively in the urban growth and infrastructure arena. This paper discusses three versions of systems techniques and compares their concepts with those of other planning processes. Through a retrospective view of a systems dynamics modeling project, the paper shows how quantitative analysis can be applied to an urban water supply system, and discusses how other systems techniques are used in the decision process. The paper argues that comprehensive models could provide better decision information and inspire greater public confidence in the decision process, but they cannot eliminate uncertainty and conflict, nor can they replace the planning processes with public involvement that have evolved alongside systems technologies. However, systems and model techniques can enable civil engineers to provide more leadership by fathoming the complexity of issues and explaining options more clearly during the decision process.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleSystemic Analysis of Urban Water Supply and Growth Management
typeJournal Paper
journal volume123
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Urban Planning and Development
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(1997)123:2(23)
treeJournal of Urban Planning and Development:;1997:;Volume ( 123 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record