Show simple item record

contributor authorDouglas D. Gransberg
contributor authorSanjaya P. Senadheera
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:03:50Z
date available2017-05-08T21:03:50Z
date copyrightNovember 1999
date issued1999
identifier other%28asce%290733-947x%281999%29125%3A6%28565%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/37228
description abstractA nationwide survey of state Departments of Transportation (DOTs) found that 15 states are using design-build (DB) to procure highway construction projects. Analysis of their methods yielded three different systems to advertise and award DB highway projects. The methods are low-bid DB, adjusted score DB, and best value DB. The paper details the three methods and compares their strengths and weaknesses. It is concluded that each method is a valid system for procuring highway construction projects and that each method can be matched with certain project characteristics to optimize the project delivery method with respect to the salient aspects of the project.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleDesign-Build Contract Award Methods for Transportation Projects
typeJournal Paper
journal volume125
journal issue6
journal titleJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1999)125:6(565)
treeJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;1999:;Volume ( 125 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record