Show simple item record

contributor authorAdib Kanafani
contributor authorTheodore Keeler
contributor authorShashi K. Sathisan
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:02:59Z
date available2017-05-08T21:02:59Z
date copyrightJuly 1993
date issued1993
identifier other%28asce%290733-947x%281993%29119%3A4%28655%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/36723
description abstractThis study looks at the concept of airline safety posture. This concept is introduced to reflect how well an airline is positioned for safety operations. Fortunately, airline accidents are far too rare for meaningful statistical analysis of airline safety. However, the incidence of incidents that could represent safety hazards but do not necessarily result in accidents is relatively frequent and lends itself to such analysis. Difficulties encountered during operation are usually reported as service difficulty reports (SDRs). Despite the many problems in the reports, not the least of which is inadequate reporting, the writers use SDRs as an indicator of safety posture. A statistical analysis suggests that airline deregulation has not adversely affected the safety posture of airlines. It is also found that the safety posture of postderegulation new entrants is not significantly different from that of established airlines. There is evidence that the larger carriers have a better safety posture than the smaller ones, and that service difficulties increase with stage length.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleAirline Safety Posture: Evidence from Service‐Difficulty Reports
typeJournal Paper
journal volume119
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1993)119:4(655)
treeJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;1993:;Volume ( 119 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record