Show simple item record

date accessioned2017-05-08T21:02:36Z
date available2017-05-08T21:02:36Z
date copyrightJuly 1990
date issued1990
identifier other%28asce%290733-947x%281990%29116%3A4%28532%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/36515
description abstractFifty‐nine urban transportation professionals replied to a survey on the approriate strategems to be employed in preventing severe traffic congestion. Personal philosohies on the engineer's past role in the problem's development are examined as well, and these responses have been classified by employment sector. These professionals seem to agree on very little, but do seem to perceive the problems involved. Respondents are polled in particular on approaches now being taken in the private sector for new development, wherein the developer, the owner, and the tenants are committed to a role in solving the area's future transportation problems. Much misinformation and unawareness seems to exist about such devices as impact fees and trip reduction ordinances. Great caution is exhibited, especially about the general legalities of these new strategies. Traditional tools and approaches were more favored. The various transportation strategies are ranked by respondents as to potential in combatting congestion.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleGridlock—Poll of Engineer's Perceptions
typeJournal Paper
journal volume116
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1990)116:4(532)
treeJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;1990:;Volume ( 116 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record