Show simple item record

contributor authorH. Paul Shuch
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:02:31Z
date available2017-05-08T21:02:31Z
date copyrightSeptember 1989
date issued1989
identifier other%28asce%290733-947x%281989%29115%3A5%28474%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/36450
description abstractMidair collisions are often perceived as the number‐one safety issue in aviation. Though the actual incidence of such accidents is (thankfully) small, public perception of the problem, and the government's reaction to it, may threaten the very future of general aviation. Midair collisions are primarily a general aviation problem. Its solution starts with the review of accident statistics and nearmidair report data, an exploration of prior art, and an understanding of the capabilities and limitations of TCAS (Threat alert and Collision Avoidance System), the FAA's supplement to visual traffic avoidance. This paper contemplates the need for an “ideal” general aviation collision avoidance system—one which is selfcontained, noncooperative in nature (requiring no equipment in the “other” plane), transparent to the Air Traffic Control System, and fully compatible with TCAS and all other FAA proposals.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleGeneral Aviation Collision‐Avoidance Alternatives
typeJournal Paper
journal volume115
journal issue5
journal titleJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1989)115:5(474)
treeJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;1989:;Volume ( 115 ):;issue: 005
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record