Show simple item record

contributor authorDavid Mahalel
contributor authorJoseph Craus
contributor authorA. Polus
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:02:13Z
date available2017-05-08T21:02:13Z
date copyrightSeptember 1986
date issued1986
identifier other%28asce%290733-947x%281986%29112%3A5%28495%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/36276
description abstractThis paper presents an evaluation of two types of staggered intersections compared with a four‐leg cross intersection, with the aim of analyzing the safety and operational characteristics of the intersection layout. The advantages of the staggered intersection are advanced as an alternative layout to the cross intersection. Although the main advantage of a staggered intersection is in safety, this type also has operational advantages in some cases. The safety advantage manifests itself in the need of crossing major road traffic from the minor road to slow down, and in the lower number of conflict points and conflict streams. The operational advantage of a right‐left staggered intersection results from the driver having to cross only one traffic stream with each turn. A quantitative evaluation of different traffic characteristics is carried out. Delays, number of stops, capacity, and geometric delay of the minor road are analyzed for the three types of intersections; the interferences to the major road are also discussed.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleEvaluation of Staggered and Cross Intersections
typeJournal Paper
journal volume112
journal issue5
journal titleJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1986)112:5(495)
treeJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;1986:;Volume ( 112 ):;issue: 005
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record