Show simple item record

contributor authorRobert Cervero
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:02:09Z
date available2017-05-08T21:02:09Z
date copyrightNovember 1985
date issued1985
identifier other%28asce%290733-947x%281985%29111%3A6%28633%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/36235
description abstractToronto and Montreal are often cited for having effectively tied together rail transit and land‐use planning. This paper probes whether two other Canadian cities, Calgary and Edmonton, have been equally successful with their recent light rail transit systems. Both Calgary and Edmonton have pioneered the development of the modern‐day version of turn‐of‐the‐century streetcar technology. Moreover, both have pursued creative approaches to zoning, joint development, cost sharing, and parking policies. An examination of before and after data, however, suggests that LRT's impacts on densities, residential construction, and mixed‐use development have been quite modest in both places. Moreover, costs per passenger have risen steadily during the post‐LRT period in both places, while total transit patronage levels have stabilized. It is apparent that the recent downturn in both Calgary's and Edmonton's petroleum‐sensitive economies have overshadowed any effects of LRT on urban form or travel behavior. Some local observers, however, remain optimistic that the longer term consequences of LRT in both communities will be substantial.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleA Tale of Two Cities: Light Rail Transit in Canada
typeJournal Paper
journal volume111
journal issue6
journal titleJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1985)111:6(633)
treeJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;1985:;Volume ( 111 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record