Show simple item record

contributor authorDonald R. Richards
contributor authorKnud E. Hermansen
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:01:24Z
date available2017-05-08T21:01:24Z
date copyrightNovember 1995
date issued1995
identifier other%28asce%290733-9453%281995%29121%3A4%28177%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/35749
description abstractWhen deeds are confusing, ambiguous, or poorly written it may be difficult to determine the boundaries of the property described. In an effort to uphold the intended conveyance of the parties to a deed, the court commonly accepts clarification of the written description of a deed by the use of evidence from outside the deed known as extrinsic evidence. The evidence may be used to clarify ambiguities, terms, errors, omissions, and conflicts; to verify monuments; to clarify circumstances surrounding the conveyance; and to verify lost deeds. The evidence may consist of parol evidence; historic surveys, plans, maps, aerial photographs, unrecorded papers, evidence of the actions of the parties, and certain statements made by knowledgeable parties. Surveyors often must use extrinsic evidence. Therefore, surveyors should know when extrinsic evidence can be used and must be able to explain in a court of law the validity of its use in preparing a survey. This paper is written to be specific to the laws of the state of Maine, yet many of the principles are applicable across the United States.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleUse of Extrinsic Evidence to Aid Interpretation of Deeds
typeJournal Paper
journal volume121
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Surveying Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9453(1995)121:4(177)
treeJournal of Surveying Engineering:;1995:;Volume ( 121 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record