Show simple item record

contributor authorLeroy K. Latta, Jr.
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:01:13Z
date available2017-05-08T21:01:13Z
date copyrightNovember 1989
date issued1989
identifier other%28asce%290733-9453%281989%29115%3A4%28362%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/35618
description abstractFederal land surveys were mandated by Indian treaties, executive orders, and acts of Congress to expedite the allotment of Indian reservations. Congressional funding for these surveys seldom equaled the costs of the task. Various federal agencies were responsible for establishing allotment boundaries. The three‐mile method was the technique developed to subdivide a section, with monuments established at equidistant points on a line instead of at intersections with perpendicular lines, as public‐land surveys require. This reduced survey mileage and costs. Also, Indian allotment corners were set by the federal surveyor, rather than protracting the section subdivision on the plat and leaving monumentation to private surveyors hired by the land claimant. Only on exterior section boundaries are the allotment corners in the same position as their counterpart aliquot‐part corners. Problems arise when modern resurveys ignore, or do not discover, existing three‐mile method surveys, and sections are resubdivided by aliquot‐part public land methods. The result is mislocated boundaries, which may place allotment land and resources outside the erroneous resurvey lines.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleHistory and Method of Indian Allotment Surveys
typeJournal Paper
journal volume115
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Surveying Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9453(1989)115:4(362)
treeJournal of Surveying Engineering:;1989:;Volume ( 115 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record