Show simple item record

contributor authorWilliam H. Sprinsky
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:01:05Z
date available2017-05-08T21:01:05Z
date copyrightJune 1987
date issued1987
identifier other%28asce%290733-9453%281987%29113%3A2%2870%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/35547
description abstractCompass (Bowditch's) rule and Crandall's method (the “least squares” solution, in many coordinate geometry programs) are commonly used to adjust traverses for construction and land survey applications. The assumptions made to derive either of those methods do not match today's instrumentation, particularly modern distance‐measuring equipment. Presented is an algorithm, based on the idea by George W. Tuttle, a contemporary of Crandall, which adjusts a closed traverse with results very much like those from a minimum variance solution, also presented, but without the complexity of computation. Both methods, which apportion corrections based upon the accuracies of observations, are compared to both compass and and Crandall's solutions, using data the accuracies of which are comparable to those of modern instrumentation.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleTransverse Adjustment for Observations from Modern Survey Instrumentation
typeJournal Paper
journal volume113
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Surveying Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9453(1987)113:2(70)
treeJournal of Surveying Engineering:;1987:;Volume ( 113 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record