Show simple item record

contributor authorGeerhard Haaijer
contributor authorPhillip S. Carskaddan
contributor authorMichael A. Grubb
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:50:19Z
date available2017-05-08T20:50:19Z
date copyrightJanuary 1983
date issued1983
identifier other%28asce%290733-9445%281983%29109%3A1%28188%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/28799
description abstractCurrent methods of steel‐bridge design, including the AASHTO Load Factor Design method, are based on elastic analyses with only limited implicit recognition of the ability of such members to adjust for. the effects of yielding. The Autostress method, which is an extension of the Load Factor method, explicitly considers these effects at Overload and Maximum Load. At Overload, autostresses and automoments caused by local plastic deformations assure elastic behavior; i.e., shakedown, after initial passages of heavy permit loads. Limit‐state criteria for riding quality and concrete cracking are considered. At Maximum Load, the strength of continuous bridge members is determined with a new plastic‐design method for noncompact members. The new design criteria can be used for the design of new bridges and for the rating of existing bridges.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleAutostress Design of Steel Bridges
typeJournal Paper
journal volume109
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Structural Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1983)109:1(188)
treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;1983:;Volume ( 109 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record