Show simple item record

contributor authorM. Kumar
contributor authorN. S. Raghuwanshi
contributor authorR. Singh
contributor authorW. W. Wallender
contributor authorW. O. Pruitt
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:49:17Z
date available2017-05-08T20:49:17Z
date copyrightAugust 2002
date issued2002
identifier other%28asce%290733-9437%282002%29128%3A4%28224%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/28124
description abstractThis study investigates the utility of artificial neural networks (ANNs) for estimation of daily grass reference crop evapotranspiration (ETo) and compares the performance of ANNs with the conventional method (Penman–Monteith) used to estimate ETo. Several issues associated with the use of ANNs are examined, including different learning methods, number of processing elements in the hidden layer(s), and the number of hidden layers. Three learning methods, namely, the standard back-propagation with learning rates of 0.2 and 0.8, and backpropagation with momentum were considered. The best ANN architecture for estimation of daily ETo was obtained for two different data sets (Sets 1 and 2) for Davis, Calif. Using data of Set 1, the networks were trained with daily climatic data (solar radiation, maximum and minimum temperature, maximum and minimum relative humidity, and wind speed) as input and the Penman–Monteith (PM) estimated ETo as output. The best ANN architecture was selected on the basis of weighted standard error of estimate (WSEE) and minimal ANN architecture. The ANN architecture of 6-7-1, (six, seven, and one neuron(s) in the input, hidden, and output layers, respectively) gave the minimum WSEE (less than 0.3 mm/day) for all learning methods. This value was lower than the WSEE (0.74 mm/day) between the PM method and lysimeter measured ETo as reported by Jensen et al. in 1990. Similarly, ANNs were trained, validated, and tested using the lysimeter measured ETo and corresponding climatic data (Set 2). Again, all learning methods gave less WSEE (less than 0.60 mm/day) as compared to the PM method (0.97 mm/day). Based on these results, it can be concluded that the ANN can predict ETo better than the conventional method (PM) for Davis.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleEstimating Evapotranspiration using Artificial Neural Network
typeJournal Paper
journal volume128
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2002)128:4(224)
treeJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2002:;Volume ( 128 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record