Show simple item record

contributor authorZubair Ahmed
contributor authorT. D. White
contributor authorT. Kuczek
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:48:45Z
date available2017-05-08T20:48:45Z
date copyrightMay 1997
date issued1997
identifier other%28asce%290733-9437%281997%29123%3A3%28194%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/27794
description abstractLong-term pavement performance in wet climates is directly related to the amount, extent, and duration of internal moisture. Retention of moisture in base/subbase layers can lead to damage and premature failure of the pavement structure. A positive subdrainage system can mitigate moisture retention. Two types of subdrainage collector systems are commonly used for removing subsurface moisture from pavement systems. These are the conventional perforated pipe edge drains and the prefabricated edge drains (PFEDs) or geotextile fin drains. Significant research was conducted in Indiana on in-place asphalt, concrete, and overlaid pavement sections incorporating these two types of subdrainage systems. Data collected from instrumented sites show varying response rates and time of outflow with respect to precipitation for pavement and collector types. Pavement-shoulder joints were found to be the major source of surface infiltration. Statistical analysis has shown significant influence of base permeability in addition to pavement and drain types on outflow volumes.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleComparative Field Performance of Subdrainage Systems
typeJournal Paper
journal volume123
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1997)123:3(194)
treeJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;1997:;Volume ( 123 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record