Show simple item record

contributor authorT. R. Davies
contributor authorV. Manville
contributor authorM. Kunz
contributor authorL. Donadini
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:45:50Z
date available2017-05-08T20:45:50Z
date copyrightJuly 2007
date issued2007
identifier other%28asce%290733-9429%282007%29133%3A7%28713%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/26317
description abstractLandslide dams typically comprise unconsolidated and poorly sorted material and are vulnerable to rapid failure and breaching, resulting in significant and sudden flood risk downstream. Hence they constitute a serious natural hazard, and rapid assessment of the likely peak flow rate is required to enable preparation of adequate mitigation strategies. To determine the relative utility and accuracy of dambreak flood forecasts, field estimates of peak outflow rates from the failure of the Poerua landslide dam in October 1999 were compared with estimates from physical laboratory modeling, empirical methods, and computer modeling. There was reasonable agreement among the field estimates, laboratory modeling, and computer modeling. Some empirical estimates were less reliable. Reasonably reliable estimates of peak outflow can be obtained from computer model routines sufficiently rapidly to be of use in an emergency management situation. The laboratory modeling demonstrated the effect of dam batter slopes and valley bed slope on peak outflow; this information could be used to refine empirical or numerical estimates of peak outflow.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleModeling Landslide Dambreak Flood Magnitudes: Case Study
typeJournal Paper
journal volume133
journal issue7
journal titleJournal of Hydraulic Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2007)133:7(713)
treeJournal of Hydraulic Engineering:;2007:;Volume ( 133 ):;issue: 007
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record