Show simple item record

contributor authorLeo R. Beard
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:42:05Z
date available2017-05-08T20:42:05Z
date copyrightJune 1994
date issued1994
identifier other%28asce%290733-9429%281994%29120%3A6%28679%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/23989
description abstractEvery engineering computation is attended by some degree of uncertainty due to factors not taken into account and limitations of data. As a result, computed values differ from true values in nature, and the size and frequency of these differences determine if any particular estimate is a best estimate. A best estimate of any variable may be defined as one that produces an unbiased least‐squares estimate in the objective variable, defined as the variable that is critical in application. It is not necessarily a least‐squares estimate of that particular working variable. In project design, there is always some probability of overdesign and some probability of underdesign (due to uncertainties), and the consequences can be vastly different. If the objective variable is net expected cost where underdesign and overdesign are each appropriately penalized, minimizing net expected cost will automatically provide an appropriate factor of safety and consequently a best design.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleAnatomy of Best Estimate
typeJournal Paper
journal volume120
journal issue6
journal titleJournal of Hydraulic Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1994)120:6(679)
treeJournal of Hydraulic Engineering:;1994:;Volume ( 120 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record