Show simple item record

contributor authorJoseph P. Beverage
contributor authorDavid T. Williams
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:40:25Z
date available2017-05-08T20:40:25Z
date copyrightDecember 1989
date issued1989
identifier other%28asce%290733-9429%281989%29115%3A12%281702%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/23090
description abstractThe US P-61 suspended-sediment sampler has an electrically operated valve in the nozzle and samples isokinetically the entire mass of water and sediment entering its nozzle. The Delft Bottle (DB) is a continuous flow-through device that collects by deposition most of the coarse sediment entering its nozzle but allows the water and finer sediments to pass through it. The minimum size of particle that deposits in the DB increases with increasing stream velocity. When the samplers were compared on the basis of computed total sand transport (material > 0.062 mm), the transport rates computed from samples collected by the P-61 were about twice those of the DB. DB transport rates in the 0.062–0.125 mm size fraction were much lower than P-61 rates for the same size. In the 0.125–0.250 mm size fraction, the DB and P-61 rates were nearly equal for transport, less than 200 g/m
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleComparison: US P‐61 and Delft Sediment Samplers
typeJournal Paper
journal volume115
journal issue12
journal titleJournal of Hydraulic Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1989)115:12(1702)
treeJournal of Hydraulic Engineering:;1989:;Volume ( 115 ):;issue: 012
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record