| contributor author | H. Randolph Thomas | |
| contributor author | Michael J. Horman | |
| contributor author | Ubiraci Espinelli Lemes de Souza | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T20:39:51Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T20:39:51Z | |
| date copyright | December 2004 | |
| date issued | 2004 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%290733-9364%282004%29130%3A6%28908%29.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/22798 | |
| description abstract | This paper introduces a concept heretofore unrecognized in multiple crew relationships: symbiotic crew relationships. A symbiotic relationship occurs when the work pace of one crew depends on the pace of a preceding crew. Data from steel reinforcement activities from six commercial and residential projects in Brazil are used to demonstrate the negative effects of symbiotic relationships. The steel reinforcement on the case study projects was cut and bent on site. In this context, the pace of the installation crew’s work (and hence performance) was dictated by the pace of the cutting and bending crew. The performance of crews with symbiotic relationships is shown to be consistently worse than when symbiotic relationships are not present. Symbiotic relationships are also tied to time buffers. There is better performance as the time buffer between crews approaches | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Symbiotic Crew Relationships and Labor Flow | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 130 | |
| journal issue | 6 | |
| journal title | Journal of Construction Engineering and Management | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:6(908) | |
| tree | Journal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2004:;Volume ( 130 ):;issue: 006 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |