Show simple item record

contributor authorP. H. Azoury
contributor authorM. Baasiri
contributor authorH. Najm
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:39:25Z
date available2017-05-08T20:39:25Z
date copyrightOctober 1986
date issued1986
identifier other%28asce%290733-9429%281986%29112%3A10%28890%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/22575
description abstractThe computerized method of chacteristics was used to analyze, for a single pipeline discharging into free air, the effect of valve‐closure schedule on water hammer under turbulent friction conditions. The inherent valve schedule was assumed to be a simple continuous power function of the fraction of the closing time, this function yielding a variety of standard valve configurations. A chart is presented to determine the valve schedule that should be used to yield minimum water hammer pressure. With the exception of the minimum pressure case, the same water hammer strength can be obtained with two different schedules. This follows from the type of schedule function used and from the compatibility equations of unsteady flow through closed conduits. Also, it was found that cavitation is less serious for an inherent valve schedule in which the bulk of the pressure surge occurs during the second part rather than during the first part of valve‐closure.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleEffect of Valve‐Closure Schedule on Water Hammer
typeJournal Paper
journal volume112
journal issue10
journal titleJournal of Hydraulic Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1986)112:10(890)
treeJournal of Hydraulic Engineering:;1986:;Volume ( 112 ):;issue: 010
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record