Show simple item record

contributor authorElliott E. Drumright
contributor authorCharles W. Pfingsten
contributor authorRobert G. Lukas
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:38:09Z
date available2017-05-08T20:38:09Z
date copyrightJuly 1996
date issued1996
identifier other%28asce%290733-9410%281996%29122%3A7%28598%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/21905
description abstractThe case of a relatively uniform sand site in Chicago is presented. Standard penetration test (SPT) values from samples driven using a drilling rig equipped with an automatic hammer were consistently lower than those from samples driven using a safety hammer. This is due to the higher efficiency of the automatic hammer, which results in greater energy delivered per blow. When averaged at each depth, the results indicated that SPT values using an automatic sampling hammer were approximately 75% of those recorded using the older-style safety hammer. The trend was consistent throughout the sand profile. This agrees with previously published relationships that indicate SPT results using automatic hammers can be expected to be approximately two-thirds of those recorded using safety hammers.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleInfluence of Hammer Type on SPT Results
typeJournal Paper
journal volume122
journal issue7
journal titleJournal of Geotechnical Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:7(598)
treeJournal of Geotechnical Engineering:;1996:;Volume ( 122 ):;issue: 007
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record