Show simple item record

contributor authorAnand J. Puppala
contributor authorYalcin B. Acar
contributor authorKare Senneset
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:36:48Z
date available2017-05-08T20:36:48Z
date copyrightDecember 1993
date issued1993
identifier other%28asce%290733-9410%281993%29119%3A12%281990%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/21195
description abstractTwo bearing‐capacity theories are used to predict cone‐penetration tip resistance and sleeve friction in weakly cemented sands. These theories use the rigid‐plastic assumption for stress‐deformation behavior of soils. Both theories provided good predictions of tip resistance when compared with experimental values obtained in limited penetration tests conducted in the laboratory. Laboratory tests were conducted on artificially cemented specimens of Monterey No. 0/30 sand prepared in rigid molds. A curing period of 14 days was used. The confinement was due only to the self‐weight, rendering very low confining stresses. Predicting sleeve friction with bearing‐capacity theories necessitated an estimate of the lateral earth pressures. The recorded sleeve‐friction values implied higher lateral pressures than the
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleCone Penetration in Cemented Sands: Bearing Capacity Interpretation
typeJournal Paper
journal volume119
journal issue12
journal titleJournal of Geotechnical Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1993)119:12(1990)
treeJournal of Geotechnical Engineering:;1993:;Volume ( 119 ):;issue: 012
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record