Show simple item record

contributor authorBrian A. Chappell
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:35:40Z
date available2017-05-08T20:35:40Z
date copyrightApril 1990
date issued1990
identifier other%28asce%290733-9410%281990%29116%3A4%28625%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/20619
description abstractClassification systems define rock mass zones that represent the potential behavior of the rock mass when subjected to load changes. Rock mass characterization, as opposed to rock mass classification, is described by an example of the right‐abutment ridge, Thomson Dam, Australia. Geological investigations demarcate the discontinuities into sets covering specific zones or domains. Samples from these rock zones are retrieved and indexed and the zones are then bounded and classified. From selected sites, discontinuity samples are retrieved and laboratory‐tested for strength and stiffness. Rock material moduli and joint stiffnesses are combined using two simple models representing the constraints of equilibrium and compatibility, and produce the predicted rock mass' anisotropic moduli. Measured in situ rock mass moduli are compared with predicted moduli. Of the various discontinuity types, the bedding plane thrust faults have the lowest strengths and greatest deformational potential. Fault gouge and its association with clay content control the friction angle and deformability potential.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleRock Mass Characterization for Dam Foundations
typeJournal Paper
journal volume116
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Geotechnical Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1990)116:4(625)
treeJournal of Geotechnical Engineering:;1990:;Volume ( 116 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record