Show simple item record

contributor authorElio D'Appolonia
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:35:30Z
date available2017-05-08T20:35:30Z
date copyrightJanuary 1990
date issued1990
identifier other%28asce%290733-9410%281990%29116%3A1%284%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/20538
description abstractThe suppression of innovation and matters of regulations and litigation too often stem from our traditional approach to the engineering design process, in which problems are considered and decisions made during design. Decisions formed from inadequate data and inadequate evaluation of risk become fixed in concrete, steel, and earth. There is a reluctance to change design decisions once made; a reluctance that increases once construction is under way, and becomes a resistance once a facility is in operation. Yet for many projects, decisions to modify a design need to be made during construction as well as during operation, particularly when unexpected behavior occurs. Data from long‐term monitoring should be integrated into the design process provide a basis for future decisions and maintain a facility in a functional state consistent with its intended purpose. A planned approach to decision making over time that draws on long‐term field measurements for input, with planned analysis of the measurements and appropriate contingent actions, is sought. A monitored‐decision process provides a means to gain knowledge, be innovative, and mitigate adverse relationships between parties involved in the ownership, construction, and operation of a facility.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleMonitored Decisions
typeJournal Paper
journal volume116
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Geotechnical Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1990)116:1(4)
treeJournal of Geotechnical Engineering:;1990:;Volume ( 116 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record