| contributor author | Athanacios N. Nasr | |
| contributor author | Chitta R. Gangopadhyay | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T20:34:53Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T20:34:53Z | |
| date copyright | November 1988 | |
| date issued | 1988 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%290733-9410%281988%29114%3A11%281209%29.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/20213 | |
| description abstract | There are at least five different methods for interpreting the results of field pressuremeter tests. Each of these methods yields different values of undrained shear strength when applied to the same pressuremeter test. A laboratory pressuremeter model was designed to simulate the pressuremeter test. Sedimented kaolinite samples were used for the laboratory model tests. These samples were consolidated to different values of the maximum vertical pressure and with overconsolidation ratios ranging from one to eight. For comparison purposes, two sets of | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Study of Su Predicted by Pressuremeter Test | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 114 | |
| journal issue | 11 | |
| journal title | Journal of Geotechnical Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1988)114:11(1209) | |
| tree | Journal of Geotechnical Engineering:;1988:;Volume ( 114 ):;issue: 011 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |