| contributor author | Brian A. Chappell | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T20:34:18Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T20:34:18Z | |
| date copyright | July 1986 | |
| date issued | 1986 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%290733-9410%281986%29112%3A7%28682%29.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/19915 | |
| description abstract | In order to determine the deformational response of a rock mass, the rock mass is often considered and characterized as an anisotropic composite material. This compliance is generally defined in terms of deformation; the effects of stress distributions within the rock mass are not considered. Two simple models are used in this paper to define the total rock mass compliance. The one model represents the deformational mode where the stresses within the composite material are equal and the second model represents the stress distributions within the composite material where the strains between the composite material are equal. In addition to neglecting the effects of stress distribution on the compliance of the rock mass, relative volumes of the intact and joint material and their spatial distribution are generally neglected. These relative volumes and their spatial distribution relative to the applied loads are an important part of the rock mass compliance, especially when shear tractions are applied. | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Stress Distribution in Anisotropic Compliance of Jointed Rock | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 112 | |
| journal issue | 7 | |
| journal title | Journal of Geotechnical Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1986)112:7(682) | |
| tree | Journal of Geotechnical Engineering:;1986:;Volume ( 112 ):;issue: 007 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |