Show simple item record

contributor authorDavid E. Foreman
contributor authorDavid E. Daniel
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:34:18Z
date available2017-05-08T20:34:18Z
date copyrightJuly 1986
date issued1986
identifier other%28asce%290733-9410%281986%29112%3A7%28669%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/19914
description abstractHydraulic conductivities were measured on three compacted clays that were permeated with water, methanol, and heptane in rigid‐wall and flexible‐wall permeameters. The type of permeameter had little effect when the soils were permeated with water. However, rigid‐wall permeameters generally yielded much higher hydraulic conductivities than flexible‐wall cells when the soils were permeated with organic compounds. Differences in effective stress and confinement along the sidewall of the test specimen are thought to be responsible for the different patterns noted. Permeation of water‐saturated clay with heptane caused the hydraulic conductivity to drop to practically zero because of surface tension effects at the water‐heptane interface. There appeared to be a threshold hydraulic gradient below which the hydraulic conductivity to heptane was zero. The results of this study show order‐of‐magnitude differences in hydraulic conductivity depending on testing apparatus and procedures.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titlePermeation of Compacted Clay with Organic Chemicals
typeJournal Paper
journal volume112
journal issue7
journal titleJournal of Geotechnical Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1986)112:7(669)
treeJournal of Geotechnical Engineering:;1986:;Volume ( 112 ):;issue: 007
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record