Show simple item record

contributor authorAdel G. Kasim
contributor authorMing‐Yau Chu
contributor authorCurtis N. Jensen
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:34:16Z
date available2017-05-08T20:34:16Z
date copyrightMarch 1986
date issued1986
identifier other%28asce%290733-9410%281986%29112%3A3%28368%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/19889
description abstractIn recent years, attempts have been made to correlate standard penetration blow counts with cone penetration tip resistance readings in order to utilize the large data base and experience of standard penetration tests to interpret the results of cone penetration soundings. As part of a liquefaction-susceptibility study on a site consisting of a laterally-extensive hydraulic sand fill over natural sands, correlation data were obtained from side-by-side standard penetration and cone penetration tests. The standard penetration tests were corrected on a standard uniform energy basis and the cone penetration tests were made with an electronic cone. It was concluded that the correlation between the mean grain size of the sand and the ratio of the cone tip resistance to standard penetration test blow counts vary significantly with the presence of fines (material smaller than a US Standard #=200 size sieve). It is suggested that this variation be considered when making evaluations of settlement, stability, and liquefaction analyses for soil profiles explored primarily with a cone penetrometer.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleField Correlation of Cone and Standard Penetration Tests
typeJournal Paper
journal volume112
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Geotechnical Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1986)112:3(368)
treeJournal of Geotechnical Engineering:;1986:;Volume ( 112 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record