Show simple item record

contributor authorRaj P. Khera
contributor authorH. Schulz
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:33:32Z
date available2017-05-08T20:33:32Z
date copyrightFebruary 1984
date issued1984
identifier other%28asce%290733-9410%281984%29110%3A2%28189%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/19527
description abstractIt is shown in this paper that in a highly overconsolidated undis turbed clay, due to natural unloading, most of the strain was recovered in the vertical direction, but not in the horizontal direction. Consolidation tests were performed on both undisturbed and remolded specimens, with the specimens oriented as in conventional tests (V‐test) and at right angle (H‐test). Estimated precompression stress for V‐tests was considered inadequate to define the max imum past consolidation stress. Estimated precompression stress from H‐tests was comparatively higher, and gave a more realistic estimate for maximum past consolidation stress. However, when the soil was allowed to swell at a low stress, the H‐tests also behaved similar to the V‐tests. It is postulated, that, the lesser the degree of strain recovery since the unloading of the soil, the better is the estimate for precompression stress. Electron micrographs showed no pre ferred particle orientation for undisturbed specimens in the natural state and after loading to 26 tsf (2.6 MPa). For remolded samples, conventional tests yielded accurate values of maximum precompression stress.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titlePast Consolidation Stress Estimates in Cretaceous Clay
typeJournal Paper
journal volume110
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Geotechnical Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1984)110:2(189)
treeJournal of Geotechnical Engineering:;1984:;Volume ( 110 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record