Show simple item record

contributor authorDavid J. Harmelink
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:33:04Z
date available2017-05-08T20:33:04Z
date copyrightAugust 2001
date issued2001
identifier other%28asce%290733-9364%282001%29127%3A4%28255%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/19310
description abstractBy definition, any activity not on the critical path must have float. The concept of float in the critical path method relates to how long an activity can be delayed before it becomes a critical activity. For linear construction activities, however, the concept of float is somewhat different from that of traditional scheduling techniques. Rather than start time and duration being the main attributes of float, production rate is a more fundamental attribute of a linear activity. As such, for float to be meaningful for a linear activity, it must be reflective of the activity's major characteristic. Rate float captures this characteristic and presents information to construction planners and managers in terms that are meaningful for linear projects. This paper describes rate float as it applies to the linear scheduling model developed by Harmelink and Rowings in 1998.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleLinear Scheduling Model: Float Characteristics
typeJournal Paper
journal volume127
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2001)127:4(255)
treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2001:;Volume ( 127 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record