Show simple item record

contributor authorA. J. Wheeler
contributor authorJ. P. Johnston
date accessioned2017-05-09T01:36:33Z
date available2017-05-09T01:36:33Z
date copyrightSeptember, 1973
date issued1973
identifier issn0098-2202
identifier otherJFEGA4-26849#415_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/163878
description abstractPredictions have been made for a variety of experimental three-dimensional boundary layer flows with a single finite difference method which was used with three different turbulent stress models: (i) an eddy viscosity model, (ii) the “Nash” model, and (iii) the “Bradshaw” model. For many purposes, even the simplest stress model (eddy viscosity) was adequate to predict the mean velocity field. On the other hand, the profile of shear stress direction was not correctly predicted in one case by any model tested. The high sensitivity of the predicted results to free stream pressure gradient in separating flow cases is demonstrated.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleAn Assessment of Three-Dimensional Turbulent Boundary Layer Prediction Methods
typeJournal Paper
journal volume95
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.3447045
journal fristpage415
journal lastpage421
identifier eissn1528-901X
keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
keywordsTurbulence
keywordsEddies (Fluid dynamics)
keywordsViscosity
keywordsStress
keywordsShear (Mechanics)
keywordsBoundary layers
keywordsBoundary layer turbulence
keywordsFinite difference methods AND Pressure gradient
treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;1973:;volume( 095 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record