Show simple item record

contributor authorGeorge Rudinger
date accessioned2017-05-09T01:35:44Z
date available2017-05-09T01:35:44Z
date copyrightSeptember, 1961
date issued1961
identifier issn0098-2202
identifier otherJFEGA4-27232#341_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/163386
description abstractThe calculation of a nonsteady flow discharging into the atmosphere, or into a large reservoir, is generally based on the assumption that the effective exit pressure is the same as if the flow were steady. In reality, however, the steady-flow boundary conditions are asymptotically approached after a disturbance produced by an incident wave, and recently published investigations provide a better approximation to these transient boundary conditions. Utilizing these results, one can compute the rate of discharge and compare it with the rate obtained in the conventional manner. The difference between the results of the two calculations is used to define a lag error in the conventional calculations. Examples for discharges through an open end and through a sharp-edged orifice indicate that the actual transient flow rate may deviate considerably from that computed on the basis of steady-flow boundary conditions.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleNonsteady Discharge of Subcritical Flow
typeJournal Paper
journal volume83
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.3658961
journal fristpage341
journal lastpage348
identifier eissn1528-901X
keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
keywordsBoundary-value problems
keywordsErrors
keywordsPressure
keywordsReservoirs
keywordsWaves AND Approximation
treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;1961:;volume( 083 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record