Show simple item record

date accessioned2017-05-09T01:30:59Z
date available2017-05-09T01:30:59Z
date issued2016
identifier issn1050-0472
identifier othermd_138_05_057001.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/161787
description abstractFinally, we observe that some of the models with the best predictive accuracy have coefficients with unexpected signs—likely biased due to correlation with unobserved attributes. Despite good prediction accuracy in existing markets, where attribute correlations are similar from year to year, these models may misguide design efforts if the designer makes changes that do not follow correlations in the marketplace. For example, the sign of the coefficient for the gallons per mile (gpm) attribute of the best predictive logit model is negative, suggesting that consumers prefer lower fuel economy, all other attributes being equal. In fact, consumers may purchase vehicles with lower fuel economy because of other features of those vehicles unobserved by the modeler (e.g., size, performance, or styling attributes not captured in the model). The model predicts well if the new market retains such correlations, but a designer who lowers fuel economy alone is not likely to obtain the outcome predicted by the model. Thus, accuracy of predictions in existing markets is not a sufficient condition for use in design.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleErratum: “Sensitivity of Vehicle Market Share Predictions to Discrete Choice Model Specificationâ€‌ [Journal of Mechanical Design, 136(12), 121402]
typeJournal Paper
journal volume138
journal issue5
journal titleJournal of Mechanical Design
identifier doi10.1115/1.4032974
journal fristpage57001
journal lastpage57001
identifier eissn1528-9001
treeJournal of Mechanical Design:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 005
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record