Show simple item record

contributor authorCarpenter, H. W.
contributor authorReid, R. G.
contributor authorPaskaramoorthy, R.
date accessioned2017-05-09T01:29:06Z
date available2017-05-09T01:29:06Z
date issued2016
identifier issn0094-4289
identifier othermats_138_03_031001.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/161256
description abstractA comparison is presented between the sensitivity to measurement error of the crack compliance and layer removal methods of residual stress measurement when applied to glass fiber reinforced plastic (GFRP) pipes. This is done by adding random scatter to the exact strain distribution associated with a known stress distribution. This defines strain data that simulate experimental measurements. These data are used to determine the corresponding residual stress distributions. The error in the residual stress distribution when scatter is included can thereby be determined. It is shown that the layer removal and crack compliance methods are equally suitable for the measurement of axial and circumferential stresses in a pipe wound at only آ±55 deg. The layer removal method, however, is shown to have significantly lower sensitivity to measurement error when the axial residual stresses in layered GFRP pipes are considered.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleSensitivity Analysis of the Crack Compliance and Layer Removal Methods for Residual Stress Measurement in GFRP Pipes
typeJournal Paper
journal volume138
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Engineering Materials and Technology
identifier doi10.1115/1.4032559
journal fristpage31001
journal lastpage31001
identifier eissn1528-8889
treeJournal of Engineering Materials and Technology:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record