Show simple item record

contributor authorSallevelt, Joost L. H. P.
contributor authorPozarlik, Artur K.
contributor authorBeran, Martin
contributor authorAxelsson, Lars
contributor authorBrem, Gerrit
date accessioned2017-05-09T01:07:43Z
date available2017-05-09T01:07:43Z
date issued2014
identifier issn1528-8919
identifier othergtp_136_07_071501.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/154739
description abstractCombustion tests with bioethanol and diesel as a reference have been performed in OPRA's 2 MWe class OP16 gas turbine combustor. The main purposes of this work are to investigate the combustion quality of ethanol with respect to diesel and to validate the developed CFD model for ethanol spray combustion. The experimental investigation has been conducted in a modified OP16 gas turbine combustor, which is a reverseflow tubular combustor of the diffusion type. Bioethanol and diesel burning experiments have been performed at atmospheric pressure with a thermal input ranging from 29 to 59 kW. Exhaust gas temperature and emissions (CO, CO2, O2, NOx) were measured at various fuel flow rates while keeping the air flow rate and air temperature constant. In addition, the temperature profile of the combustor liner has been determined by applying thermochromic paint. CFD simulations have been performed with ethanol for five different operating conditions using ANSYS FLUENT. The simulations are based on a 3D RANS code. Fuel droplets representing the fuel spray are tracked throughout the domain while they interact with the gas phase. A liner temperature measurement has been used to account for heat transfer through the flame tube wall. Detailed combustion chemistry is included by using the steady laminar flamelet model. Comparison between diesel and bioethanol burning tests show similar CO emissions, but NOx concentrations are lower for bioethanol. The CFD results for CO2 and O2 are in good agreement, proving the overall integrity of the model. NOx concentrations were found to be in fair agreement, but the model failed to predict CO levels in the exhaust gas. Simulations of the fuel spray suggest that some liner wetting might have occurred. However, this finding could not be clearly confirmed by the test data.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleBioethanol Combustion in an Industrial Gas Turbine Combustor: Simulations and Experiments
typeJournal Paper
journal volume136
journal issue7
journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
identifier doi10.1115/1.4026529
journal fristpage71501
journal lastpage71501
identifier eissn0742-4795
treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2014:;volume( 136 ):;issue: 007
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record