Show simple item record

contributor authorZheng, Ziliang
contributor authorBadawy, Tamer
contributor authorHenein, Naeim
contributor authorSattler, Eric
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:58:16Z
date available2017-05-09T00:58:16Z
date issued2013
identifier issn1528-8919
identifier othergtp_135_6_061501.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/151619
description abstractThis paper investigates the physical and chemical ignition delay (ID) periods in the constant volume combustion chamber of the Ignition Quality Tester (IQT). IQT was used to determine the derived cetane number (DCN) according to ASTM D689010a standards. The fuels tested were ultra low sulfur diesel (ULSD), jet propellant8 (JP8), and two synthetic fuels of Sasol IPK and FT SPK (S8). A comparison was made between the DCN and cetane number (CN) determined according to ASTMD613 standards. Tests were conducted under steady state conditions at a constant pressure of 21 bars and various air temperatures ranging from 778 K to 848 K. The rate of heat release (RHR) was calculated from the measured pressure trace, and a detailed analysis of the RHR trace was made particularly for the autoignition process. Tests were conducted to determine the physical and chemical delay periods by comparing results obtained from two tests. In the first test, the fuel was injected into air according to ASTM standards. In the second test, the fuel was injected into nitrogen. The point at which the two resultant pressure traces separated was considered to be the end of the physical delay period. The effects of the charge temperature on the total ID as defined in ASTM D689010a standards, as well as on the physical and chemical delays, were determined. It was noticed that the physical delay represented a significant part of the total ID over all the air temperatures covered in this investigation. Arrhenius plots were developed to determine the apparent activation energy for each fuel using different IDs. The first was based on the total ID measured according to ASTM standards. The second was the chemical delay determined in this investigation. The activation energy calculated from the total ID showed higher values for lower CN fuels except Sasol IPK. The activation energy calculated from the chemical delay period showed consistency in the increase of the activation energy with the drop in CN including Sasol IPK. The difference between the two findings could be explained by examining the sensitivity of the physical delay period of different fuels to the change in air temperature.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleInvestigation of Physical and Chemical Delay Periods of Different Fuels in the Ignition Quality Tester
typeJournal Paper
journal volume135
journal issue6
journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
identifier doi10.1115/1.4023607
journal fristpage61501
journal lastpage61501
identifier eissn0742-4795
treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2013:;volume( 135 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record