Show simple item record

contributor authorMark Stonehouse
contributor authorShinichiro Kanamaru
contributor authorShawn Morrison
contributor authorTrevor G. Seipp
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:53:58Z
date available2017-05-09T00:53:58Z
date copyrightOctober, 2012
date issued2012
identifier issn0094-9930
identifier otherJPVTAS-926074#054502_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/150081
description abstractThere exist some atypical loads on pressure vessels during transportation. This is particularly true when the pressure vessel weighs over 500 tonnes. In this example vessel, the transportation was via rail on a “Schnabel car,” in which the vessel is suspended horizontally between the top nozzle and the skirt, and a significant axial compressive load is applied. During the evaluation of the stresses in the top head, a particularly novel situation was encountered which brought about some interesting issues with regards to the three design-by-analysis methods: elastic, limit load, and elastic-plastic. This paper discusses the comparison between all three of these design-by-analysis methods, and provides recommendations for which is most appropriate for this type of evaluation. Additional recommendations and warnings are provided for the use of the elastic and limit load methods as well.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleA Novel Comparison of Design-by-Analysis Methods
typeJournal Paper
journal volume134
journal issue5
journal titleJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology
identifier doi10.1115/1.4006343
journal fristpage54502
identifier eissn1528-8978
keywordsStress
keywordsDesign
keywordsBuckling
keywordsElastic analysis
keywordsFailure
keywordsVessels AND Nozzles
treeJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;2012:;volume( 134 ):;issue: 005
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record