Show simple item record

contributor authorKlas Jonshagen
contributor authorMajed Sammak
contributor authorMagnus Genrup
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:50:40Z
date available2017-05-09T00:50:40Z
date copyrightJanuary, 2012
date issued2012
identifier issn1528-8919
identifier otherJETPEZ-27180#011702_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/148939
description abstractThe partly hot-water driven CO2 capture plant offers a significant potential for improvement in performance when implemented in a combined-cycle power plant (CCPP). It is possible to achieve the same performance with a dual-pressure steam cycle as in a triple-pressure unit. Even a single-pressure plant can attain an efficiency competitive with that achievable with a triple-pressure plant without the hot-water reboiler. The underlying reasons are better heat utilization in the heat recovery unit and less steam extraction to the absorbent regenerating unit(s). In this paper, the design criteria for a combined cycle power plant utilizing hot-water absorbent regeneration will be examined and presented. The results show that the most suitable plant is one with two steam pressure levels. The low-pressure level should be much higher than in a conventional combined cycle in order to increase the amount of heat available in the economizer. The external heat required in the CO2 capture plant is partly supplied by the economizer, allowing temperature optimization in the unit. The maximum value of the low-pressure level is determined by the reboiler, as too great a temperature difference is unfavorable. This work evaluates the benefits of coupling the economizer and the reboiler in a specially designed CCPP. In the CO2 separation plant both monoethanolamine (MEA) and ammonia are evaluated as absorbents. Higher regeneration temperatures can be tolerated in ammonia-based plants than in MEA-based plants. When using a liquid heat carrier the reboiler temperature is not constant on the hot side, which results in greater temperature differences. The temperature difference can be greatly reduced by dividing the regeneration process into two units operating at different pressures. The possibility of extracting more energy from the economizer to replace part of the extracted steam increases the plant efficiency. The results show that very high efficiencies can be achieved without using multiple pressure-levels.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titlePostcombustion CO2 Capture for Combined Cycles Utilizing Hot-Water Absorbent Regeneration
typeJournal Paper
journal volume134
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
identifier doi10.1115/1.4004146
journal fristpage11702
identifier eissn0742-4795
keywordsPressure
keywordsHeat
keywordsTemperature
keywordsCombined cycle power stations
keywordsCycles
keywordsIndustrial plants
keywordsSteam
keywordsWater
keywordsCarbon capture and storage
keywordsHot water
keywordsSeparation (Technology)
keywordsDesign AND Exhaust gas recirculation
treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2012:;volume( 134 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record