Show simple item record

contributor authorGerry Slagis
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:46:40Z
date available2017-05-09T00:46:40Z
date copyrightApril, 2011
date issued2011
identifier issn0094-9930
identifier otherJPVTAS-28543#021102_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/147485
description abstractPiping thermal expansion stress limits for ASME Section III Class 2 and 3 piping are directly based on the original thermal expansion rules for B31.1 piping published in 1955. Temperature limits for B31 piping are much higher than for Class 2/3 nuclear piping. The fundamental concern in 1955 for piping design was to prevent cyclic creep strains, and the thermal expansion rules were based on a strain range criterion. Fatigue was also a concern, and a stress-range reduction factor for cyclic conditions was incorporated into the strain-based rule. The history and development of the B31.1 thermal expansion rules are summarized. After review of the technical basis, it becomes evident that the nuclear Class 2/3 rules can be simplified and improved by changing to an explicit fatigue-based rule rather than the strain-based rule of B31.1. Recommended Section III code revisions are provided with discussion of related technical issues.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleRecommended Revisions to Nuclear Piping Thermal Expansion Stress Limits
typeJournal Paper
journal volume133
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology
identifier doi10.1115/1.4002256
journal fristpage21102
identifier eissn1528-8978
keywordsStress
keywordsThermal stresses
keywordsPipes
keywordsThermal expansion
keywordsFatigue
keywordsTemperature AND Cycles
treeJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;2011:;volume( 133 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record