Show simple item record

contributor authorStanley Yokell
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:46:36Z
date available2017-05-09T00:46:36Z
date copyrightOctober, 2011
date issued2011
identifier issn0094-9930
identifier otherJPVTAS-28550#054502_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/147440
description abstractThis paper discusses factory and field pressure testing of tubular heat transfer equipment such as closed feedwater heaters, steam surface condensers, and power plant auxiliary heat exchangers built in accordance with Section VIII, Division 1 of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (the ASME Code) and repaired or altered in accordance with the National Board Inspection Code (NBIC) (The ASME issues the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code at three-year intervals and issues Addenda annually; The National Board Inspection Code (NBIC), 2007 edition (three volumes), ANSI/NBBPVI NB23-2007, The National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors, Cleveland, OH). It discusses the ASME Code’s and the NBIC’s requirements for hydrostatically testing unfired pressure vessels, which include tubular heat transfer equipment. It shows by analysis that using pressure gauge indications of pressure loss to determine if there is a leak from the tube side to the shell side when the back face of the tubesheet is not visible does not reveal very small leaks or weeping. For the purposes of this paper, we define weeping, Vleak, as a leak of 20 drops/h or approximately 1 cm3/h(0.061 in.3/h). During typical half-hour hydrostatic test pressure-holding periods, such weeping would amount to 10 drops of water on the tubesheet face or 0.5 cm3(0.0305 in.3). Weeping through tube-to-tubesheet joints of high pressure feedwater heaters can lead to wire drawing (wormholing), which can materially reduce the heater life. Leaks from the channel to the shell side of steam surface condensers and auxiliary condensers can introduce brackish water into the condensate. Depending upon the fluid flowing in the tubes, contaminants can enter the shell side of other auxiliary equipment when the channel pressure is higher than that of the shell. This paper concludes that users must advise designers and manufacturers of the hazards of small leaks through the tube-to-tubesheet joints. It recommends that these three entities must agree on suitable leak tests.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titlePressure Testing Feedwater Heaters and Power Plant Auxiliary Heat Exchangers
typeJournal Paper
journal volume133
journal issue5
journal titleJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology
identifier doi10.1115/1.4003468
journal fristpage54502
identifier eissn1528-8978
keywordsChannels (Hydraulic engineering)
keywordsFeedwater
keywordsHeat exchangers
keywordsPower stations
keywordsTesting
keywordsPressure
keywordsShells
keywordsLeakage
keywordsASME Standards
keywordsHydrostatic testing
keywordsWater
keywordsPressure testing AND Fluids
treeJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;2011:;volume( 133 ):;issue: 005
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record