Show simple item record

contributor authorEric Liese
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:37:41Z
date available2017-05-09T00:37:41Z
date copyrightJune, 2010
date issued2010
identifier issn1528-8919
identifier otherJETPEZ-27116#061703_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/143182
description abstractThis paper examines the arrangement of a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) within a coal gasification cycle, this combination generally being called an integrated gasification fuel cell cycle. This work relies on a previous study performed by the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) that details thermodynamic simulations of integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) systems and considers various gasifier types and includes cases for 90% CO2 capture (2007, “Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants, Vol. 1: Bituminous Coal and Natural Gas to Electricity,” National Energy Technology Laboratory Report No. DOE/NETL-2007/1281). All systems in this study assume a Conoco Philips gasifier and cold-gas clean up conditions for the coal gasification system (Cases 3 and 4 in the NETL IGCC report). Four system arrangements, cases, are examined. Cases 1 and 2 remove the CO2 after the SOFC anode. Case 3 assumes steam addition, a water-gas-shift (WGS) catalyst, and a Selexol process to remove the CO2 in the gas cleanup section, sending a hydrogen-rich gas to the fuel cell anode. Case 4 assumes Selexol in the cold-gas cleanup section as in Case 3; however, there is no steam addition, and the WGS takes places in the SOFC and after the anode. Results demonstrate significant efficiency advantages compared with IGCC with CO2 capture. The hydrogen-rich case (Case 3) has better net electric efficiency compared with typical postanode CO2 capture cases (Cases 1 and 2), with a simpler arrangement but at a lower SOFC power density, or a lower efficiency at the same power density. Case 4 gives an efficiency similar to Case 3 but also at a lower SOFC power density. Carbon deposition concerns are also discussed.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleComparison of Preanode and Postanode Carbon Dioxide Separation for IGFC Systems
typeJournal Paper
journal volume132
journal issue6
journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
identifier doi10.1115/1.4000140
journal fristpage61703
identifier eissn0742-4795
keywordsSeparation (Technology)
keywordsAnodes
keywordsFuels
keywordsCarbon
keywordsFuel cells
keywordsSolid oxide fuel cells
keywordsDensity
keywordsPressure
keywordsHydrogen
keywordsSteam
keywordsSyngas
keywordsIntegrated gasification combined cycle
keywordsTemperature
keywordsElectric potential
keywordsCycles
keywordsExhaust systems
keywordsWater
keywordsCarbon dioxide AND Heat
treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2010:;volume( 132 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record