Show simple item record

contributor authorNikolett Sipöcz
contributor authorMohsen Assadi
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:37:41Z
date available2017-05-09T00:37:41Z
date copyrightJune, 2010
date issued2010
identifier issn1528-8919
identifier otherJETPEZ-27116#061701_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/143180
description abstractAs carbon capture and storage technology has grown as a promising option to significantly reduce CO2 emissions, system integration and optimization claim an important and crucial role. This paper presents a comparative study of a gas turbine cycle with postcombustion CO2 separation using an amine-based absorption process with monoethanolamine. The study has been made for a triple pressure reheated 400 MWe natural gas-fuelled combined cycle with exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) to improve capture efficiency. Two different options for the energy supply to the solvent regeneration have been evaluated and compared concerning plant performance. In the first alternative heat is provided by steam extracted internally from the bottoming steam cycle, while in the second option an external biomass-fuelled boiler was utilized to generate the required heat. With this novel configuration the amount of CO2 captured can be even more than 100% if the exhaust gas from the biofuelled boiler is mixed and cleaned together with the main exhaust gas flow from the combined cycle. In order to make an unprejudiced comparison between the two alternatives, the reduced steam turbine efficiency has been taken into consideration and estimated, for the alternative with internal steam extraction. The cycles have been modeled in the commercial heat and mass balance program IPSEPRO ™ using detailed component models. Utilizing EGR can double the CO2 content of the exhaust gases and reduce the energy need for the separation process by approximately 2% points. Using an external biomass-fuelled boiler as heat source for amine regeneration turns out to be an interesting option due to high CO2 capture effectiveness. However the electrical efficiency of the power plant is reduced compared with the option with internal steam extraction. Another drawback with the external boiler is the higher investment costs but nevertheless, it is flexibility due to the independency from the rest of the power generation system represents a major operational advantage.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleCombined Cycles With CO2 Capture: Two Alternatives for System Integration
typeJournal Paper
journal volume132
journal issue6
journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
identifier doi10.1115/1.4000122
journal fristpage61701
identifier eissn0742-4795
keywordsHeat
keywordsSeparation (Technology)
keywordsBiomass
keywordsBoilers
keywordsPower stations
keywordsCycles
keywordsIndustrial plants
keywordsSteam
keywordsExhaust gas recirculation
keywordsExhaust systems
keywordsSteam turbines
keywordsPressure
keywordsAbsorption
keywordsEmissions AND Temperature
treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2010:;volume( 132 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record