Show simple item record

contributor authorPatrick Kirchen
contributor authorAndrea Bertola
contributor authorPeter Obrecht
contributor authorKonstantinos Boulouchos
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:37:28Z
date available2017-05-09T00:37:28Z
date copyrightNovember, 2010
date issued2010
identifier issn1528-8919
identifier otherJETPEZ-27141#112804_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/143061
description abstractThe operation and emissions of a four cylinder, passenger car common-rail diesel engine operating with two different fuels was investigated on the basis of exhaust-stream and in-cylinder soot measurements, as well as a thermodynamic analysis of the combustion process. The two fuels considered were a standard diesel fuel and a synthetic diesel (fuel two) with a lower aromatic content, evaporation temperature, and cetane number than the standard diesel. The exhaust-stream soot emissions, measured using a filter smoke number system, as well as a photo-acoustic soot sensor (AVL Micro Soot Sensor), were lower with the second fuel throughout the entire engine operating map. To elucidate the cause of the reduced exhaust-stream soot emissions, the in-cylinder soot temperature and the KL factor (proportional to concentration) were measured using miniature, three-color pyrometers mounted in the glow plug bores. Using the maximum KL factor value to quantify the soot formation process, it was seen that for all operating points, less soot was formed in the combustion chamber using the second fuel. The oxidation of the soot, however, was not strongly influenced by the fuel, as the relative oxidized soot fraction was not significantly different for the two fuels. The reduced soot formation of fuel two was attributed to the lower aromatic content of the fuel. The soot cloud temperatures for operation with the two fuels were not seen differ significantly. Similar correlations between the cylinder-out soot emissions, characterized using the pyrometers, and the exhaust-stream soot emissions were seen for both fuels. The combustion process itself was only seen to differ between the two fuels to a much lesser degree than the soot formation process. The predominant differences were seen as higher maximum fuel conversion rates during premixed combustion at several operating points, when fuel two was used. This was attributed to the lower evaporation temperatures and longer ignition delays (characterized by the lower cetane number) leading to larger premixed combustion fractions.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleExhaust-Stream and In-Cylinder Measurements and Analysis of the Soot Emissions From a Common Rail Diesel Engine Using Two Fuels
typeJournal Paper
journal volume132
journal issue11
journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
identifier doi10.1115/1.4001083
journal fristpage112804
identifier eissn0742-4795
keywordsMeasurement
keywordsFuels
keywordsCylinders
keywordsExhaust systems
keywordsSoot
keywordsEmissions
keywordsCombustion
keywordsoxidation
keywordsEngines
keywordsDiesel engines
keywordsRails AND Pyrometers
treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2010:;volume( 132 ):;issue: 011
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record