Show simple item record

contributor authorMarco Gambini
contributor authorMichela Vellini
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:23:36Z
date available2017-05-09T00:23:36Z
date copyrightOctober, 2007
date issued2007
identifier issn1528-8919
identifier otherJETPEZ-26973#1114_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/135682
description abstractIn this paper two options for H2 production, by means of natural gas, are presented and their performances are evaluated when they are integrated with advanced H2/air cycles. In this investigation two different schemes have been analyzed: an advanced combined cycle power plant (CC) and a new advanced mixed cycle power plant (AMC). The two methods for producing H2 are as follows: (1) steam methane reforming: it is the simplest and potentially the most economic method for producing hydrogen in the foreseeable future; and (2) partial oxidation of methane: it could offer an energy advantage because this method reduces the energy requirement of the reforming process. These hydrogen production plants require material and energetic integrations with power section and the best interconnections must be investigated in order to obtain good overall performance. With reference to thermodynamic and economic performance, significant comparisons have been made between the above introduced reference plants. An efficiency decrease and an increase in the cost of electricity has been obtained when power plants are equipped with a natural gas decarbonization section. The main results of the performed investigation are quite variable among the different H2 production technologies here considered: the efficiency decreases in a range of 5.5 percentage points to nearly 10 for the partial oxidation of the natural gas and in a range of about 9 percentage points to over 12 for the steam methane reforming. The electricity production cost increases in a range of about 41–42% for the first option and in a range of about 34–38% for the second one. The AMC, coupled with partial oxidation, stands out among the other power plant solutions here analyzed because it exhibits the highest net efficiency and the lowest final specific CO2 emission. In addition to this, economic impact is favorable when AMC is equipped with systems for H2 production based on partial oxidation of natural gas.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleNatural Gas Decarbonization Technologies for Advanced Power Plants
typeJournal Paper
journal volume129
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
identifier doi10.1115/1.2719266
journal fristpage1114
journal lastpage1124
identifier eissn0742-4795
keywordsNatural gas
keywordsPower stations
keywordsIndustrial plants
keywordsMethane
keywordsSteam
keywordsEmissions
keywordsoxidation
keywordsHeat
keywordsHydrogen AND Fuels
treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2007:;volume( 129 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record